The NYT Investigation Links Adam Back to Bitcoin’s Creator

On April 8, 2026, the New York Times unveiled the findings of a year-long investigation, suggesting that British cryptographer Adam Back may be the enigmatic creator of Bitcoin, known as Satoshi Nakamoto. However, the publication’s claims are largely circumstantial and lack definitive proof.

Investigative journalist John Carreyrou led the piece, which highlights the results of stylometric analysis carried out by linguist Florian Cafiero. This analysis, while indicating that Back was the closest match to the writing style of Satoshi’s white paper among twelve candidates, also acknowledged that the findings were inconclusive. Back, now the CEO of a Bitcoin treasury company pursuing a merger with a Cantor Fitzgerald shell entity, has firmly denied these allegations, doing so multiple times during a two-hour interview in El Salvador.

TRUSTED PARTNER

3.9 ★★★☆☆

Review and Opinions →

🔥 Bonus 1.400 $

Bonus Instant + 225 FS 🏆

Open an account

The investigation delves into various elements linking Back to Nakamoto, including shared ideological beliefs, overlapping technical concepts, and behavioral observations during a filmed interview. Carreyrou pointed to a moment from an HBO documentary where Back’s body language appeared tense when questioned about his potential connection to Satoshi. This reaction, Carreyrou argued, fueled further investigation.

Back is a notable figure in the history of cryptocurrency, having created Hashcash in 1997, a precursor to Bitcoin that Satoshi referenced in the original white paper. He was part of the Cypherpunks mailing list during the mid-1990s, where discussions on distributed electronic cash took place, mirroring some of Bitcoin’s foundational ideas. Such connections, according to Carreyrou, hold significance.

Despite the intriguing nature of the claims, the crypto community has been largely skeptical of the Times’ assertions. Bitcoin contributor Jameson Lopp criticized the newspaper for putting undue scrutiny on Back with what he perceived as weak evidence. Similarly, Alex Thorn, head researcher at Galaxy Digital, expressed disbelief, suggesting that the Times’ article exemplified a recurring theme of sensational journalism in the search for Nakamoto.

Additional analyses pointed out instances of alignment between Back’s and Nakamoto’s writing styles, including 67 shared hyphenation errors. Carreyrou noted that specific phrases were consistently used in similar contexts by both parties across various writings. Still, some remained unconvinced, arguing that such parallels could be mere coincidences.

TRUSTED PARTNER

4.4 ★★★★☆

Review and Opinions →

🔥 100% up to 1 BTC

180 Free Spins 🏆

Open an account

Back’s communications with Nakamoto, revealed during the Craig Wright fraud trial in London, also raised eyebrows, as they appeared to indicate contact prior to the release of the Bitcoin white paper. However, Carreyrou speculated without concrete evidence that these exchanges could have been fabricated by Back to obscure his identity.

The claim that Back is Satoshi is not new; theories regarding his potential identity have circulated for years. The piece briefly examines other suspects, noting that some, like Nick Szabo, have faded in consideration due to public scrutiny, while others have passed away, complicating the investigation.

As Back continues to develop his company, which has raised substantial funding and is valued at $3.2 billion, the mystery surrounding Nakamoto remains unsolved, leaving many to ponder the implications of this ongoing enigma. Despite the New York Times’ claims, the search for Bitcoin’s true creator continues, with no definitive answers in sight.